<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>




<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Which? Policy</title>
					<link>http://www.which.co.uk/about-which/what-we-do/which-policy</link>		
		
		<description></description>
		<language>en-gb</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2010, Which?</copyright>
		<managingEditor>editor@which.co.uk</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webadmin@which.co.uk</webMaster>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:55:28 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:55:28 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Percussion Rhythmyx 6.5</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<skipHours><hour>0</hour><hour>1</hour><hour>2</hour><hour>3</hour><hour>4</hour></skipHours>
                                                        








<item>
    <title><![CDATA[The FSA 10 years on - Which? - Briefing]]></title>
    <link>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/the-fsa-10-years-on---which---briefing-204694.pdf?src=rss185356</link>					
			<description><![CDATA[Which?'s report card on the Food Standards Agency's progress ten years since it was established, assessing how well it has been fulfilling its remit to put the consumer first.]]></description>
	    <author>editor@which.co.uk</author>
    <guid>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/the-fsa-10-years-on---which---briefing-204694.pdf?src=rss185356</guid>
	    <source url="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml">$rssTitle</source>
    </item>








<item>
    <title><![CDATA[NHS Car parking: improving access for patients (DH) - Which? - Consultation response ]]></title>
    <link>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/nhs-car-parking-improving-access-for-patients-dh---which---consultation-response--204656.pdf?src=rss185356</link>					
			<description><![CDATA[Which? argued that NHS hospital car parking is a significant issue for consumers. Problems with parking capacity and payment methods are common, and cost is an issue for many. Which? wants hospitals to develop more user friendly parking arrangements.]]></description>
	    <author>editor@which.co.uk</author>
    <guid>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/nhs-car-parking-improving-access-for-patients-dh---which---consultation-response--204656.pdf?src=rss185356</guid>
	    <source url="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml">$rssTitle</source>
    </item>








<item>
    <title><![CDATA[NHS Constitution: a consultation on new patient rights (DH) - Which? - Consultation response]]></title>
    <link>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/nhs-constitution-a-consultation-on-new-patient-rights-dh---which---consultation-response-204660.pdf?src=rss185356</link>					
			<description><![CDATA[Which? supported the principles of the Constitution and the establishment of patient rights, but argued that patients can’t assert rights which they don’t know about. A public awareness raising initiative is long overdue.]]></description>
	    <author>editor@which.co.uk</author>
    <guid>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/nhs-constitution-a-consultation-on-new-patient-rights-dh---which---consultation-response-204660.pdf?src=rss185356</guid>
	    <source url="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml">$rssTitle</source>
    </item>








<item>
    <title><![CDATA[Personal Care at Home Bill (DH) - Which? - Consultation response]]></title>
    <link>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/personal-care-at-home-bill-dh---which---consultation-response-204657.pdf?src=rss185356</link>					
			<description><![CDATA[Which? argued that the Bill will only affect a small number of people, and that the proposed eligibility threshold was too high. We supported the development of a standardised national assessment tool, and more strategies for prevention.]]></description>
	    <author>editor@which.co.uk</author>
    <guid>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/personal-care-at-home-bill-dh---which---consultation-response-204657.pdf?src=rss185356</guid>
	    <source url="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml">$rssTitle</source>
    </item>








<item>
    <title><![CDATA[Nano food - Which? - Briefing]]></title>
    <link>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/nano-food---which---briefing-196801.pdf?src=rss185356</link>					
			<description><![CDATA[This campaign briefing highlighted potential benefits from nanotechnology used in food, but also the need for greater transparency about its use and effective regulation to ensure safety and clear labelling.]]></description>
	    <author>editor@which.co.uk</author>
    <guid>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/nano-food---which---briefing-196801.pdf?src=rss185356</guid>
	    <source url="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml">$rssTitle</source>
    </item>








<item>
    <title><![CDATA[Digital Economy bill 2nd reading (unlawful file sharing) - Which? - Briefing ]]></title>
    <link>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/digital-economy-bill-2nd-reading-unlawful-file-sharing---which---briefing--190151.pdf?src=rss185356</link>					
			<description><![CDATA[Which? produced a briefing document highlighting the ways in which the Digital Economy bill could be improved to better protect consumers from wrongful accusations of unlawful file sharing.]]></description>
	    <author>editor@which.co.uk</author>
    <guid>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/digital-economy-bill-2nd-reading-unlawful-file-sharing---which---briefing--190151.pdf?src=rss185356</guid>
	    <source url="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml">$rssTitle</source>
    </item>








<item>
    <title><![CDATA[Office of Legal Complaints (OLC) Ombudsman scheme rules - Which? - Consultation response]]></title>
    <link>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/office-of-legal-complaints-olc-ombudsman-scheme-rules---which---consultation-response-190006.pdf?src=rss185356</link>					
			<description><![CDATA[Backed the overall approach of the OLC to their ombudsman scheme rules but expressed concern at the one year time limit to make a complaint and how the OLC will deal with complaints about negligence and from people complaining about someone else’s lawyer]]></description>
	    <author>editor@which.co.uk</author>
    <guid>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/office-of-legal-complaints-olc-ombudsman-scheme-rules---which---consultation-response-190006.pdf?src=rss185356</guid>
	    <source url="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml">$rssTitle</source>
    </item>








<item>
    <title><![CDATA[Shaping the future of care together (DH) - Which? - Consultation response]]></title>
    <link>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/shaping-the-future-of-care-together-dh---which---consultation-response-191240.pdf?src=rss185356</link>					
			<description><![CDATA[Which? argued for the necessity of more concrete plans for the widespread provision of a range of preventative products and services, and that the proposals on financing care left questions unanswered.]]></description>
	    <author>editor@which.co.uk</author>
    <guid>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/shaping-the-future-of-care-together-dh---which---consultation-response-191240.pdf?src=rss185356</guid>
	    <source url="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml">$rssTitle</source>
    </item>








<item>
    <title><![CDATA[Front of Pack Nutrition Labelling (FSA) - Which? - Consultation response]]></title>
    <link>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/front-of-pack-nutrition-labelling-fsa---which---consultation-response-188474.pdf?src=rss185356</link>					
			<description><![CDATA[Which? supported consistent use of the integrated front of pack nutrition label including 'high, medium and low', traffic light colours and % GDA which performed best in the FSA's research but expressed concern about certain proposals to amend the traffic light criteria.]]></description>
	    <author>editor@which.co.uk</author>
    <guid>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/front-of-pack-nutrition-labelling-fsa---which---consultation-response-188474.pdf?src=rss185356</guid>
	    <source url="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml">$rssTitle</source>
    </item>








<item>
    <title><![CDATA[Nanotechnologies: influence and inform the UK strategy (BIS) - Which? - Consultation response]]></title>
    <link>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/nanotechnologies-influence-and-inform-the-uk-strategy-bis---which---consultation-response-188487.pdf?src=rss185356</link>					
			<description><![CDATA[Which? called for companies to be transparent and to ensure pre-market safety assessments are completed; and for the UK government to plug large gaps in the science needed for risk assessment, engage consumers and introduce a mandatory reporting scheme to identify products containing nanotechnologies.]]></description>
	    <author>editor@which.co.uk</author>
    <guid>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/nanotechnologies-influence-and-inform-the-uk-strategy-bis---which---consultation-response-188487.pdf?src=rss185356</guid>
	    <source url="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml">$rssTitle</source>
    </item>








<item>
    <title><![CDATA[Saturated Fat and Sugar Reductions (FSA) - Which? - Consultation response]]></title>
    <link>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/saturated-fat-and-sugar-reductions-fsa---which---consultation-response-188475.pdf?src=rss185356</link>					
			<description><![CDATA[Which? supported the FSA's work on encouraging reductions in saturated fat and sugar levels in foods and offering a choice of portion sizes, but raised concerns about applying a blanket approach to reductions for more indulgent products.]]></description>
	    <author>editor@which.co.uk</author>
    <guid>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/saturated-fat-and-sugar-reductions-fsa---which---consultation-response-188475.pdf?src=rss185356</guid>
	    <source url="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml">$rssTitle</source>
    </item>








<item>
    <title><![CDATA[Review of the Food Standards Agency Regulatory Framework (FSA) - Which? - Consultation response]]></title>
    <link>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/review-of-the-food-standards-agency-regulatory-framework-fsa---which---consultation-response-188482.pdf?src=rss185356</link>					
			<description><![CDATA[Which? emphasised that while some clarification may be helpful, the FSA should not change the way it determines when to intervene or narrow down the tools that it uses to achieve the policy outcomes necessary to fulfil its statutory obligations on behalf of consumers.]]></description>
	    <author>editor@which.co.uk</author>
    <guid>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/review-of-the-food-standards-agency-regulatory-framework-fsa---which---consultation-response-188482.pdf?src=rss185356</guid>
	    <source url="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml">$rssTitle</source>
    </item>








<item>
    <title><![CDATA[2030 Food Vision (Defra) - Which? - Consultation response]]></title>
    <link>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/2030-food-vision-defra---which---consultation-response-188483.pdf?src=rss185356</link>					
			<description><![CDATA[Which? supported this initiative to develop a long-term vision for a sustainable food policy and ensure a more joined up approach to actions across government, highlighting key areas that needed to be addressed.]]></description>
	    <author>editor@which.co.uk</author>
    <guid>http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/2030-food-vision-defra---which---consultation-response-188483.pdf?src=rss185356</guid>
	    <source url="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml">$rssTitle</source>
    </item>		<atom:link href="http://www.which.co.uk/feeds/about-which/policy.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	</channel>
</rss>