Food labelling
Consumers have a right to know what's in the food they buy.
Consumers have a right to know what's in the food they buy.
We're campaigning for food labels that are clear, comprehensive and accurate, so consumers can make informed decisions about what they eat.
Our shopping trawls have revealed a vast array of food labels which are misleading and confusing to consumers. The campaign has prompted manufacturers to make wide-scale changes to labels - one withdrew a label within an hour of being named and shamed.
We think a consistent, easily understood labelling system is vital to help shoppers make healthy choices. We’re extremely disappointed that the European Commission has recommended a labelling system for food packaging based on Guideline Daily Amounts without traffic light colours. Find out more about why we think traffic light labelling is the best for consumers.
The EU is undertaking a major review of food labelling legislation. Which? will be fighting to ensure that useful information is not removed from labels, that labels are made clearer and that information gaps, such as country of origin, are addressed.
Which? successfully campaigned for full ingredients and allergen labelling on pre-packaged foods. We're still calling for this to become a legal requirement for alcoholic drinks.
In April 2004, Which? won its battle to have products with GM derivatives (eg soya oil) labelled. This means that even if an end product doesn't contain GM material but some has been used in the manufacturing process, the product will still have to be labelled as containing GM.
Four in five people (81 per cent) have told Which? they would be concerned if information about ingredients added to meat products was removed from the name of the food, but this valuable information could be under threat.
At present meat products that look like cuts, slices and joints of meat must clearly state what ingredients have been added to bulk up the product. Without this information it would be far more difficult to work out from the packet whether you're paying for ham that's been bulked up with water, starch or protein.
However, the Food Standards Agency (FSA) is looking at simplifying meat labelling, which could threaten this information. Which? is lobbying the FSA to ensure that in simplifying regulation it does not undermine consumer protection.
Labelling consultation response (PDF: 62Kb)23 January 2007Comment on 'Labelling: competitiveness, consumer information and better regulation for the EU'
01 May 2006Which?'s response to the EU's consultative document on labelling and better regulation; highlights where action is needed to make labelling more helpful for consumers.
Vegetarian and vegan labelling (PDF: 29Kb)01 September 2005Which? response to Food Standards Agency consultation on draft guidance on use of the terms 'vegetarian' and 'vegan' in food labelling.
Low-fact labelling (PDF: 81Kb)01 February 2005Briefing on Which? research showing foods with higher or lower levels of nutrients than stated on the packaging.
Nutrition labelling: EU (PDF: 52Kb)21 March 2003Consumers' Association response to European Commission's request for information in view of the revision of Council Directive 90/496/EEC.
Food labels, the hidden truth update (PDF: 105Kb)01 January 2003Briefing on nutrition and health claims on food labels
Food labels: the hidden truth (PDF: 399Kb)01 April 2002Consumers' Association briefing on the campaign for honest labelling.
Advice on country of origin labelling (PDF: 45Kb)26 March 2002Consumers' Association response to Food Standards Agency consultation.
Food labelling: ingredient listing and allergens (PDF: 44Kb)01 December 2001Consumers' Association response to Food Standards Agency consultation.
Better labelling of food and drink (PDF: 83Kb)01 March 2000Consumers' Association response to Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food consultation.
PDF files require Adobe Acrobat Reader software (opens in a new window)
Special offers on all our magazine titles