Traffic light labelling
Shoppers need simple front-of-pack labels so that healthy choices are easier to find.
Shoppers need simple front-of-pack labels so that healthy choices are easier to find.
Which? believes that supermarket shelves full of different, contrasting food labels will confuse shoppers. And the public agrees – almost three quarters (73%) said different types of labels would be confusing.
One consistent, traffic light scheme across all manufacturers and retailers will allow people to make informed and healthy decisions every time they purchase food.
Which? wants all food companies to use the Food Standards Agency (FSA) ‘traffic light’ colours on the front of their labels. The traffic light front-of-pack nutrition label uses red, amber and green to indicate whether fat, saturated fat, sugar and salt levels are high, medium or low.
Asda, The Co-operative Group, Sainsbury’s, Waitrose, M&S, McCain, New Covent Garden Food Co, Budgens/Londis, Avondale, Moy Park, Bombay Halwa, Brittania and S&B Herba have already agreed to use the FSA system.
However, some retailers and manufacturers including Somerfield, Morrisons, Tesco, Pepsico, Danone, Kellogg's, Nestle and Kraft have rejected traffic lights in favour of a label without colours showing Guideline Daily Amounts (GDAs). Which? research shows that traffic lights are the best way to help people make healthy choices at a glance.
Which? wants Tesco and the other manufacturers promoting an alternative scheme to base their system on what the research shows works best for consumers, not what works best from a marketing perspective. They need to stop hiding behind GDAs and be honest about whether or not their products are high, medium or low in fat, sugar or salt.
The EC proposals have ignored what works best for consumers and opted for what works best for some sections of the food industry.
Sue DaviesWhich? chief policy adviser
We’re disappointed that the European Commission has recommended a system based on GDAs without traffic light colours.The proposals will need to go through a lengthy process of discussion by the European Parliament and national governments before becoming law. We want to make sure that the system which is developed is the one which works best for consumers.
It’s easy to use - The traffic light labelling scheme gives consumers, at a glance, information about whether a product is high, medium or low in fat, saturated fat, sugar or salt. Which? research shows that 97% of respondents were able to correctly identify and compare levels of nutrients using the traffic light system.
It’s been extensively researched - The FSA recommended that the food industry use multiple traffic lights on their products after extensive research, including interviews with over 2,600 people, found it to be the best system.
It helps all consumers - The FSA research, reinforced by our own, found that the GDA scheme was confusing for some consumers, particularly those from lower socio-economic groups.
Traffic lights interpret guideline daily amounts - The Which? and FSA research shows that consumers value traffic light colour coding as a way of interpreting what the levels shown mean, e.g. is 20% of your GDA for salt high, medium or low?
It has EU-wide support – A research review by BEUC, the European Consumer Organisation, found that an interpretative element, such as the use of colour coding to indicate nutrient levels, is the most helpful approach for consumers. BEUC supports multiple traffic lights.
To help you interpret food labels more easily, we've made a simple food shopper's guide you can print, cut out and tuck into your wallet or purse.
European Commission proposal to overhaul EU food labelling rules Full details of the EC proposals.
Traffic light labels work best (PDF: 43Kb)04 January 2007Clear front of pack nutrition labelling is crucial in helping people to eat more healthily.
Healthy signs (PDF: 1909Kb)10 July 2006Which? report outlining consumers' reactions to various proposed 'traffic light' signpost labelling schemes.
07 February 2006Which?'s response to the Food Standards Agency consultation, supporting the FSA's proposal for a multiple traffic light scheme
Nutrient profiling II (PDF: 42Kb)01 September 2005Which?'s comments supporting the latest stage in the development by the Food Standards Agency of a nutrient profiling model distinguishing between foods that are high in fat, sugar and salt and healthier options.
Low-fact labelling (PDF: 81Kb)01 February 2005Briefing on Which? research showing foods with higher or lower levels of nutrients than stated on the packaging.
Nutrient profiling (PDF: 39Kb)01 February 2005Which?'s comments on a Food Standards Agency consultation on a model for defining 'foods high in fat, salt and sugar' and 'healthier options'.
Food labels, the hidden truth update (PDF: 105Kb)01 January 2003Briefing on nutrition and health claims on food labels
Food labels: the hidden truth (PDF: 399Kb)01 April 2002Consumers' Association briefing on the campaign for honest labelling.
PDF files require Adobe Acrobat Reader software (opens in a new window)
Special offers on all our magazine titles