Which? uses cookies to improve our sites and by continuing you agree to our cookies policy

Payment method surcharges - Which? super-complaint

The price you see should be the price you pay. Any necessary surcharges should not exceed the reasonable additional costs incurred by the retailer to accept that form of payment

The subject of this super-complaint, submitted to the OFT in March 2011, is the practice of applying surcharges on transactions using debit or credit cards - and in some cases other forms of payment - where consumers face no practicable alternative.

This results in distortionary effects on competition, primarily through reducing the clarity of advertised prices. Surcharges are often much greater than the additional costs the retailer would incur. As a result, the surcharge is not paying for the specific payment method but is actually part of the price of the underlying good or service, and so should be incorporated in the headline advertised price.

This super-complaint asked the OFT to take action to ensure consumers can be confident that advertised prices are a true reflection of the price they may pay, regardless of payment method chosen, and, where the complexity of the product offer makes this difficult, any surcharges related to payment method are limited to the reasonable additional costs incurred by the retailer.

See our full report:

2178 Kb

See the response to our super-complaint: 

Payment Method Surcharges - Which? super-complaint response 761 Kb